<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Technology and the Fallen Man</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ryanspilhaus.com/2010/07/technology-and-the-fallen-man/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ryanspilhaus.com/2010/07/technology-and-the-fallen-man/</link>
	<description>Building the Internet One Pixel at a Time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 21:03:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://ryanspilhaus.com/2010/07/technology-and-the-fallen-man/comment-page-1/#comment-821</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 21:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ryanspilhaus.com/?p=1083#comment-821</guid>
		<description>Spoken like a true seminarian! Love the response Mark. Very good points!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spoken like a true seminarian! Love the response Mark. Very good points!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://ryanspilhaus.com/2010/07/technology-and-the-fallen-man/comment-page-1/#comment-820</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 20:15:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ryanspilhaus.com/?p=1083#comment-820</guid>
		<description>Ryan, I like the argument that maybe there may not be mere neutrality in technology/tools/things in general. This is very interesting to think about. If unregenerate man utilizes anything, it will be for sin. For unregenerate man is a slave to sin, thus anything he/she uses would be for some sort of sin. Something I will have to think through....

Nextly, I am not sure I agree with the use of the word &quot;redeem&quot; in Brandon&#039;s repsonse. I don&#039;t think Ryan&#039;s blog is redeeming technology as a whole. But you are probably not trying to make that argument either. I hear similar arguments that Christians ought to &quot;redeem the arts and take it over.&quot;  Or &quot;redeem rap music&quot; or &quot;redeem the film industry.&quot; I am skeptical of this type of language. I think redeem is used in an overly utopian sense.  

Even believing humanity is not redeemed in full. Christ paid the down payment for our salvation, but we are not fully redeemed until the mighty return of the Lord. The phrase &quot;already, not yet&quot; explains the fullness of salvation in Christ, yet the expectation of his future coming.

All this is to say, I do know if there is any &quot;redeeming&quot; of arts or technology or any other tools. But rather, it seems to me, that there is now the opportunity for believers to use the tools that were once used for evil to be placed into and reflect the light of glory.

This may seem like semantics but I really don&#039;t think it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ryan, I like the argument that maybe there may not be mere neutrality in technology/tools/things in general. This is very interesting to think about. If unregenerate man utilizes anything, it will be for sin. For unregenerate man is a slave to sin, thus anything he/she uses would be for some sort of sin. Something I will have to think through&#8230;.</p>
<p>Nextly, I am not sure I agree with the use of the word &#8220;redeem&#8221; in Brandon&#8217;s repsonse. I don&#8217;t think Ryan&#8217;s blog is redeeming technology as a whole. But you are probably not trying to make that argument either. I hear similar arguments that Christians ought to &#8220;redeem the arts and take it over.&#8221;  Or &#8220;redeem rap music&#8221; or &#8220;redeem the film industry.&#8221; I am skeptical of this type of language. I think redeem is used in an overly utopian sense.  </p>
<p>Even believing humanity is not redeemed in full. Christ paid the down payment for our salvation, but we are not fully redeemed until the mighty return of the Lord. The phrase &#8220;already, not yet&#8221; explains the fullness of salvation in Christ, yet the expectation of his future coming.</p>
<p>All this is to say, I do know if there is any &#8220;redeeming&#8221; of arts or technology or any other tools. But rather, it seems to me, that there is now the opportunity for believers to use the tools that were once used for evil to be placed into and reflect the light of glory.</p>
<p>This may seem like semantics but I really don&#8217;t think it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://ryanspilhaus.com/2010/07/technology-and-the-fallen-man/comment-page-1/#comment-810</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2010 06:11:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ryanspilhaus.com/?p=1083#comment-810</guid>
		<description>Love the Willard tie-in. I agree!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love the Willard tie-in. I agree!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon</title>
		<link>http://ryanspilhaus.com/2010/07/technology-and-the-fallen-man/comment-page-1/#comment-808</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2010 02:52:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ryanspilhaus.com/?p=1083#comment-808</guid>
		<description>As man is fallen so too is all of creation. However God can and is using His people to redeem it. Case in point, this blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As man is fallen so too is all of creation. However God can and is using His people to redeem it. Case in point, this blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

